** This site is best viewed using Internet Explorer 7.0+ or Firefox 3.0+ Download Firefox for FREE **
Subscribe by RSSSubscribe by RSS Subscribe by EmailSubscribe by Email

Casinos, sex discrimination, makeup, and corporate dress codes

Law.com led me to this AP article from the Las Vegas Sun: “Former Harrah’s Reno bartender’s lawsuit heard in appeals court.”

A former Harrah’s Reno bartender fired for refusing to wear makeup has taken her sex-discrimination lawsuit to a federal appeals court. . .

Senior U.S. District Judge Edward Reed ruled against her last year, concluding the casino’s appearance standards are evenly applied to both sexes.

[She] was fired in August 2000 from Harrah’s, where she had worked for 21 years. She maintained that wearing makeup should be a personal choice and had nothing to do with her job performance.

The appearance standards were put in place at 20 of the company’s casinos nationwide in 2000.

“Women are very capable without makeup,” Jespersen told the Reno Gazette-Journal. “We shouldn’t be considered little tokens or dolls. We shouldn’t have to put on masks.”

But Harrah’s spokesman Gary Thompson said he thinks the appeals court will toss her lawsuit.

“The main position is that the court has upheld an employer’s right to impose reasonable grooming and cleanliness standards, particularly for employees who are serving the public,” Thompson said.

Harrah’s policy requires female employees to wear makeup and lipstick. Male workers are forbidden to wear makeup, ponytails or hair below the top of their shirt collar. . . .

“My career as a casino bartender is over,” she said. “But it would have been degrading to do what they wanted me to do. We have civil rights and laws to protect us.”

The policy can be viewed and stated as gender-neutral — employees are expected to dress and groom in accordance with normal societal expectations for their respective genders and positions. However, stating it in this way also makes it clear that it does involve different expectations for different genders. It will be interesting to read the opinion, although it’s a shame the federal courts have to waste their time on such trivialities. If you really can’t stand the dress code, go work somewhere else (apparently that is what she did).

Sphere: Related Content


Add to StumbleUponAdd to MySpaceAdd to Delicious Add to FacebookFurl this pageReddit this pageDIGG this pageAdd to MySpaceAdd to GoogleAdd to Mixx!

Related Posts

  • Makeup discrimination case continues to fascinate

  • Friday Humor: Casual Day

  • OFCCP Publishes Final Standards for Analysis of Systemic Compensation Discrimination

  • New Class Action Lawsuit Aimed Against Restaurant Chain

  • Lessons from an EEOC Wall Street harassment lawsuit


  • Posted by George Lenard
    on December 16, 2003

    If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing.

    Comments

    No comments yet.

    Leave a comment

    (required)

    (required)