** This site is best viewed using Internet Explorer 7.0+ or Firefox 3.0+ Download Firefox for FREE **
Subscribe by RSSSubscribe by RSS Subscribe by EmailSubscribe by Email

Interesting whistleblower/1st amendment allegations

Findlaw (AP) reports: “Colo. Worker Fired After Outed As Source.”

“A planner for a ski resort was fired after she was identified as an anonymous source who criticized Aspen for its development of a housing and retail development.”

Her comments included an allegation that “back-room” negotiations were being employed by the developers and the town. She modified that statement the following day, saying, “I never meant to imply that there was anything illegal going on. It’s just the community is not being listened to. Anybody has the right to say that.”

The Town Manager said she was fired because of the comment in the newspaper.

She said “It’s like [the Town Manager] stuck out his tongue and said, ‘So sue us.’”

So will Colo. law protect her as a whistleblower, though she alleged no illegality? Haven’t researched it, but I’m doubtful. As an employee of a subdivision of a state, does she have a valid First Amendment retaliation claim? Closer call, I think, depending on extent to which this was a matter of public interest. Seems like the Town’s already admitted causation.

Sphere: Related Content


Add to StumbleUponAdd to MySpaceAdd to Delicious Add to FacebookFurl this pageReddit this pageDIGG this pageAdd to MySpaceAdd to GoogleAdd to Mixx!

Related Posts

  • Don’t Fight Back! Avoiding Retaliation Claims

  • Employee Referral Programs: New Opportunities for Theft?

  • Religious Discrimination Against a Witch?

  • Government Contractors Go “Offshore” for Tech Workers: to Rural America

  • Friday Humor: From a Federal Judge, No Less


  • Posted by George Lenard
    on October 24, 2003

    If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing.

    Comments

    No comments yet.

    Leave a comment

    (required)

    (required)