Reasonable dress code — 3 earrings per lobe max?

December 30, 2003

Findlaw (AP)reports: “Fla. Workers Allowed 3 Earrings Per Lobe.”

Adding that seventh earring before going to work for the county could get you into piercing trouble.

Administrators have decided that three earrings per earlobe is the maximum amount of “facial jewelry” employees will be allowed to wear in Orange County offices, and that all other facial piercing will be forbidden.

Loops through eyebrows, nose rings and studs through tongues will have no future place for county employees.

“They can’t even speak well when they have their tongues pierced,” said Commissioner Mary I. Johnson, 70.
That and it’s disgusting . . .

Even the earring policy comes with a caveat: none of the three rings are to be worn on the top half of the ear, according to the county’s “Dress Code and Appearance Policy.”

“It’s our belief that facial jewelry does not present the professional appearance we want our employees to have when dealing with the public,” said Deputy County Administrator Sharon Donoghue, who helped develop the new rules.

The lone holdout among commissioners was Homer Hartage, who was overruled.

“Occasionally there will be employees who are good workers, but they see the world a little bit differently than the rest of us,” he said.
This seems to be a pretty reasonable policy for employees with public contact. Those who “see the world a little bit differently” when it comes to facial jewelry probably see it too differently to work well with the public for other reasons as well (spoken like a true member of the over-40 generation).

No doubt somebody could come up with a legal basis for challenging the policy, but I’m not sure what it would be and doubt it would be successful.

Anyway, that some employers have such policies is an additional additional reason for me to draw the line on three per ear for my 15-year-old daughter, who has already reached this limit.





Related Posts


Iowa Supreme Court upholds grooming policy prohibiting male earrings

Casinos, sex discrimination, makeup, and corporate dress codes

A slew of pro-employee legislative developments in Illinois

High-visibility tattoos and piercings regretted by maturing employees

A comment on comments (re Abercrombie)


George Lenard on General

comment Permalink



This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 30th, 2003 at 7:09 pm and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

If you want to leave a feedback to this post or to some other user´s comment, simply fill out the form below.

(required)

(required)




George’s Employment Blawg is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!