** This site is best viewed using Internet Explorer 7.0+ or Firefox 3.0+ Download Firefox for FREE **
Subscribe by RSSSubscribe by RSS Subscribe by EmailSubscribe by Email

Fellow blogger comments on George’s snide remarks about Wal-Mart class action

Catherine Collingwood maintains a fine blog; it’s listed on my blogroll at right under Blogs, Labor/Employment/HR. She writes about a number of her other interests, but as someone working in HR she often posts thoughtful pieces on HR and benefits issues.

Yesterday she wrote this post: Wal-Mart class action: more than recovery

Catherine says:

Mr. Lenard asks a good question about the rates of actual recovery, but I don’t think that is the important issue here. A consent order from a class-action lawsuit can have sweeping policy and procedure changes; this does not happen with non-class-action lawsuits.

In other words, the benefits from a class-action lawsuit extend well beyond recovery [by "recovery" she means the typically puny money damages paid to class members]. Read more

I responded with a comment (click replies in her post — or click here and scroll down), and we dialogued a bit.

Catherine, thanks for reading and keeping me on my toes.

Sphere: Related Content


Add to StumbleUponAdd to MySpaceAdd to Delicious Add to FacebookFurl this pageReddit this pageDIGG this pageAdd to MySpaceAdd to GoogleAdd to Mixx!

Related Posts

  • The Status of Class Action Employment Discrimination Lawsuits

  • Even More On FedEx’s Use of the BST Testing: Is It Really Valid?

  • Latest Discrimination Class Action Target: Best Buy (will Target be next target?)

  • Is Your Company A Target for A Discrimination Class Action Suit? Ten Factors to Consider

  • A Great Educational Use of Blogging


  • Posted by George Lenard
    on June 23, 2004

    If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing.

    Comments

    No comments yet.

    Leave a comment

    (required)

    (required)