<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dial To Pay $3M for Strength Test with Disparate Impact on Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/dial-to-pay-3m-for-strength-test-with-disparate-impact-on-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/dial-to-pay-3m-for-strength-test-with-disparate-impact-on-women/</link>
	<description>Workplace News &#38; Views, Edited by St. Louis Labor &#38; Employment Lawyer George Lenard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review #33</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/dial-to-pay-3m-for-strength-test-with-disparate-impact-on-women/comment-page-1/#comment-40390</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review #33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/?p=43#comment-40390</guid>
		<description>[...] test to screen applicants for a job requiring much lifting. George Lenard’s Employment Blawg originally covered the case last month, Overlawyered picked it up, and now George has returned to the subject, observing that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] test to screen applicants for a job requiring much lifting. George Lenard’s Employment Blawg originally covered the case last month, Overlawyered picked it up, and now George has returned to the subject, observing that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George&#8217;s Employment Blawg &#187; Plain Talk About Employment Testing From a Straight Shooter</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/dial-to-pay-3m-for-strength-test-with-disparate-impact-on-women/comment-page-1/#comment-5538</link>
		<dc:creator>George&#8217;s Employment Blawg &#187; Plain Talk About Employment Testing From a Straight Shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/?p=43#comment-5538</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Dial To Pay $3M for Strength Test with Disparate Impact on Women&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Dial To Pay $3M for Strength Test with Disparate Impact on Women&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George&#8217;s Employment Blawg &#187; Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Employment Testing (But Didn&#8217;t Know Where to Ask)</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/dial-to-pay-3m-for-strength-test-with-disparate-impact-on-women/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>George&#8217;s Employment Blawg &#187; Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Employment Testing (But Didn&#8217;t Know Where to Ask)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/?p=43#comment-272</guid>
		<description>[...] We have also looked at case law regarding employment testing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have also looked at case law regarding employment testing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy B</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/dial-to-pay-3m-for-strength-test-with-disparate-impact-on-women/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/?p=43#comment-21</guid>
		<description>As I read it, the main qualification that the EEOC requires is to be unable, or unqualified for the job.  Therefore, I should be allowed to work as a lawyer or judge, because I am not a law school graduate.  Or maybe head up the EEOC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read it, the main qualification that the EEOC requires is to be unable, or unqualified for the job.  Therefore, I should be allowed to work as a lawyer or judge, because I am not a law school graduate.  Or maybe head up the EEOC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
