<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did EEOC &#8220;Overlawyer&#8221; the Dial Corp. Employment Testing Case?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/did-eeoc-overlawyer-the-dial-corp-employment-testing-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/did-eeoc-overlawyer-the-dial-corp-employment-testing-case/</link>
	<description>Workplace News &#38; Views, Edited by St. Louis Labor &#38; Employment Lawyer George Lenard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:49:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review #33</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2005/did-eeoc-overlawyer-the-dial-corp-employment-testing-case/comment-page-1/#comment-40391</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review #33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/?p=119#comment-40391</guid>
		<description>[...] Blawg originally covered the case last month, Overlawyered picked it up, and now George has returned to the subject, observing that those dissatisfied with the suit’s outcome should realize that sex discrimination [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blawg originally covered the case last month, Overlawyered picked it up, and now George has returned to the subject, observing that those dissatisfied with the suit’s outcome should realize that sex discrimination [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
