** This site is best viewed using Internet Explorer 7.0+ or Firefox 3.0+ Download Firefox for FREE **
Subscribe by RSSSubscribe by RSS Subscribe by EmailSubscribe by Email

Middle Management Job Dissatisfaction Presents Opportunities for Recruiters and Companies That “Get” Current Human Resources Issues

Numbers from an Accenture survey of middle managers tell the story:

Wall Street Journal: “Ready to Bail? Job Satisfaction Plunges Among Middle Managers”

Can anyone say “passive candidate”?

As described more subjectively in the Journal article, middle managers’ angst can’t be cured by throwing money at them.

It derives from the fact they don’t perceive their companies “as well managed, well run, as companies they would aspire to have a long-term career with.”

They feel torn between front-line workers looking for more input and opportunities and senior managers driving them hard to achieve financial gains. “They’re feeling more and more like they’re being squeezed by senior managers pushing hard to get results and by lower-level people saying ‘Show me you care about me, invest in me and develop me for the future.’”

“They just are not getting the sense there’s a plan, that there’s a consistency about how things are being handled, managed and communicated so they can have the confidence that whatever happens that is negative in the organization is going to turn around.”

Need I explain this post’s title?

It’s practically a roadmap to management recruiting. Seize the day and snap up the best of those dissatisfied managers.

Seek out the best active and passive candidates, while working hard to address current human resources issues and adopt progressive HR practices and modern management practices, including clear promotion paths, various forms of employee feedback, and improved flexibility and employee training and development.

Demonstrate to managers that they will be “in the loop,” on company strategies and that the employees they will supervise are valued and treated well.

Above all else, show that the company “gets it” about the value of human capital and views good human resource practices as a bottom line contributor and investment, not an unwanted overhead cost to be squeezed.

Finally, to keep good employees, take the Journal’s closing advice: “take seriously the possibility of greater dissatisfaction resulting in higher turnover . . . ; people do absolutely feel like there are more options today than there were a year ago.”

Photo credit: pulpolux via flickr
Creative Commons License

For additional current information, don’t forget to visit our “Recent Reading” page, a blog-within-a-blog.

Sphere: Related Content


Add to StumbleUponAdd to MySpaceAdd to Delicious Add to FacebookFurl this pageReddit this pageDIGG this pageAdd to MySpaceAdd to GoogleAdd to Mixx!

Related Posts

  • When this Blawg’s Michael Harris Speaks, Reporters as Well as Students Listen

  • New Study Blames “Bad Bosses” on Lack of Training

  • It Takes a Village - Career Development Coaching and Mentoring Programs on the Rise

  • HR Metrics and Strategic Human Resources Planning

  • EEOC Releases New Compliance Manual on Race and Color Discrimination


  • Posted by George Lenard
    on November 7, 2005

    If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing.

    Comments

    No comments yet.

    Leave a comment

    (required)

    (required)


    vpn service