** This site is best viewed using Internet Explorer 7.0+ or Firefox 3.0+ Download Firefox for FREE **
Subscribe by RSSSubscribe by RSS Subscribe by EmailSubscribe by Email

Dear John: Some Potential Suggestions for Writing Applicant Rejection Letters

It is always interesting to discuss how to craft a candidate rejection letter. Indeed, some might wonder whether such letters should even be written! I found a recent article discussing some characteristics of a successful rejection letter.

Most interestingly, the author mentioned a practice that Circuit City used years ago, in which the rejection letter offered a 10% discount on purchases. I thought that this was a good idea, but the author felt it was a bad practice!

Anyhow, here are some suggestions, and my comments, offered by the author on a well-crafted rejection letter:

*Rejection letters should be sent to applicants who are not offered a job (I agree; better for the candidate to know and move on than to wonder and hope that an interview/offer may be forthcoming);

*But don’t send the rejection letter too quickly — the candidate may feel that he/she was totally unqualified (I don’t completely agree; as above, better for the candidate to know and to move on);

*Be personable and specific about why another candidate was hired – but not too specific, as that could cause legal problems (I agree, but I think it difficult to write a personable letter. I also think that legal concerns push companies to be very vague in their reasons for hiring another candidate);

*Include a statement about the person who received the job (I disagree on this; I don’t think that many candidates will find the information useful and I think it is more likely to cause legal problems than build good-will among rejected candididates).

Here is my spin on rejection letters; it is never easy to write an effective one and there is probably more to be gained by being vague, general, and non-specific than there is by being specific and precise.

Read more on this interesting article on how to write a better rejection letter.

Sphere: Related Content


Add to StumbleUponAdd to MySpaceAdd to Delicious Add to FacebookFurl this pageReddit this pageDIGG this pageAdd to MySpaceAdd to GoogleAdd to Mixx!

Related Posts

  • From the Other Side of the Fence: The Impact of the OFCCP Internet Applicant Regs on Job Hunting

  • She Don’t Love Me Afterall: They Hate HR Even More

  • Latest Update on OFCCP’s Internet Applicant Definition and the Implications for Companies

  • Insider Tips to Put Your Resume On Top

  • Cover Letters: Tips for Job Hunters


  • Posted by Michael Harris
    on April 17, 2006

    If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing.

    Comments

    Basically, I think the applicant is interested in only one thing: that they have been rejected.

    In the law school hiring rat race, we called these “ding” letters; personally I never cared what they said except that they were indeed dings, not offers. The nicer they tried to be, the more ticked of I got.

    I would definitely steer wide and clear of specific reasons and of anything about person hired.

    Check out this humor on ding letters:

    “Ding Letter Party Gets Dinged”

    http://www.chibus.com/media/storage/paper408/
    news/2002/04/01/Humor/Ding-Letter.Party.Gets.
    Dinged-226296.shtml?norewrite200604171458&
    sourcedomain=www.chibus.com

    However, in a world where company reputation is supposed to make a difference in ability to hire the best, HOW the “ding letter” is written might make a difference. Personally, when I applied for jobs, it has made a difference to me in how I felt about the organization.

    Leave a comment

    (required)

    (required)