Comments on: Disparate TREATMENT vs. Disparate IMPACT http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/ Workplace News & Views, Edited by St. Louis Labor & Employment Lawyer George Lenard Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:06:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: EEOC Honing in on Disparate Impact : ERE.net http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-40793 EEOC Honing in on Disparate Impact : ERE.net Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:40 +0000 http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/#comment-40793 [...] U.S. EEOC will be “looking very, very closely at disparate impact issues,” the agency’s chair Naomi Earp said a few minutes ago here at the big ILG [...] [...] U.S. EEOC will be “looking very, very closely at disparate impact issues,” the agency’s chair Naomi Earp said a few minutes ago here at the big ILG [...]

]]> By: Tunkoo http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-40407 Tunkoo Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:08:17 +0000 http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/#comment-40407 A really worthfull information share by you. Thanks a lot! http://employee-benefit.blogspot.com/ A really worthfull information share by you. Thanks a lot!

http://employee-benefit.blogspot.com/

]]> By: Supreme Court Punts Sprint "Me Too" Evidence Case Back to Lower Court - George’s Employment Blawg: St. Louis labor & employment lawyer looks at HR, labor law, and today’s workplace http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-39666 Supreme Court Punts Sprint "Me Too" Evidence Case Back to Lower Court - George’s Employment Blawg: St. Louis labor & employment lawyer looks at HR, labor law, and today’s workplace Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:30:44 +0000 http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/#comment-39666 [...] the same work rule (or another of comparable seriousness).” Aramburu involved classic “disparate treatment” evidence — evidence of better treatment of employees differing in the protected [...] [...] the same work rule (or another of comparable seriousness).” Aramburu involved classic “disparate treatment” evidence — evidence of better treatment of employees differing in the protected [...]

]]> By: Tim Syzek http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-39456 Tim Syzek Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:19:24 +0000 http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/#comment-39456 What about a federal agency employee (GS-09)who received a written reprimand for misuse of email, with a 2-year probation? This was the minimum disciplinary measure that the employer (SES) could give at the time. Then the same SES made a statement as the subject matter expert (SME) on an employment document, which was proven false by the agency and which the SES knew to be false when he made it. The position was for a GS-11 and the applicant/employee (same as above paragraph) never received an interview. The agency admitted wrongdoing but did nothing further to discipline the SES, except let the 2-year expiration lapse on the employment document. I believe that the GS-09 federal employee received "disparate treatment" by the federal agency, since he had been treated more harshly than the employer/SES, for an incident which was a lesser transgression of the federal rules than the one the SES committed. What about a federal agency employee (GS-09)who received a written reprimand for misuse of email, with a 2-year probation? This was the minimum disciplinary measure that the employer (SES) could give at the time.

Then the same SES made a statement as the subject matter expert (SME) on an employment document, which was proven false by the agency and which the SES knew to be false when he made it. The position was for a GS-11 and the applicant/employee (same as above paragraph) never received an interview. The agency admitted wrongdoing but did nothing further to discipline the SES, except let the 2-year expiration lapse on the employment document.

I believe that the GS-09 federal employee received “disparate treatment” by the federal agency, since he had been treated more harshly than the employer/SES, for an incident which was a lesser transgression of the federal rules than the one the SES committed.

]]> By: George’s Employment Blawg » Plain Talk About Employment Testing From a Straight Shooter http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-5537 George’s Employment Blawg » Plain Talk About Employment Testing From a Straight Shooter Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:16:46 +0000 http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/disparate-treatment-vs-disparate-impact/#comment-5537 [...] “Disparate TREATMENT vs. Disparate IMPACT” [...] [...] “Disparate TREATMENT vs. Disparate IMPACT” [...]

]]>