<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How NOT To Do Employee Training: Spanking Trainees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/how-not-to-do-employee-training-avoid-spanking-the-trainees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/how-not-to-do-employee-training-avoid-spanking-the-trainees/</link>
	<description>Workplace News &#38; Views, Edited by St. Louis Labor &#38; Employment Lawyer George Lenard</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: George Lenard</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/how-not-to-do-employee-training-avoid-spanking-the-trainees/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>George Lenard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/how-not-to-do-employee-training-avoid-spanking-the-trainees/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Michael.  I got this one via email from a lawyer friend last night.

Lawyers generally shouldn't talk to the press about their cases.  It's likely that the most unfavorable, out-of-context, and very brief quote will be used. Exhibit A supporting that point is the absurd quote here.  

Interesting what you say about retaliation. I'm not sure what you mean.  What protected conduct have they engaged in? Or were you kidding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Michael.  I got this one via email from a lawyer friend last night.</p>
<p>Lawyers generally shouldn&#8217;t talk to the press about their cases.  It&#8217;s likely that the most unfavorable, out-of-context, and very brief quote will be used. Exhibit A supporting that point is the absurd quote here.  </p>
<p>Interesting what you say about retaliation. I&#8217;m not sure what you mean.  What protected conduct have they engaged in? Or were you kidding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
