<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coca-Cola &#8220;cat&#8217;s paw&#8221; subordinate bias case dismissed on settlement week before Sup. Ct. arguments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2007/coca-cola-cats-paw-subordinate-bias-case-dismissed-on-settlement-week-before-sup-ct-arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2007/coca-cola-cats-paw-subordinate-bias-case-dismissed-on-settlement-week-before-sup-ct-arguments/</link>
	<description>Workplace News &#38; Views, Edited by St. Louis Labor &#38; Employment Lawyer George Lenard</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: pictures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Coca-Cola “cat’s paw” subordinate bias case dismissed on &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2007/coca-cola-cats-paw-subordinate-bias-case-dismissed-on-settlement-week-before-sup-ct-arguments/#comment-28480</link>
		<dc:creator>pictures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Coca-Cola “cat’s paw” subordinate bias case dismissed on &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/2007/coca-cola-cats-paw-subordinate-bias-case-dismissed-on-settlement-week-before-sup-ct-arguments/#comment-28480</guid>
		<description>[...] Stephen Newton wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSupreme Court to hear Coca-Cola “cat’s paw” case. Cat’s paws, rubber stamps, and proof of race discrimination. The “Question Presented” as stated in the Supreme Court docket was:. Under what circumstances is [&#8230;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stephen Newton wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSupreme Court to hear Coca-Cola “cat’s paw” case. Cat’s paws, rubber stamps, and proof of race discrimination. The “Question Presented” as stated in the Supreme Court docket was:. Under what circumstances is [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best Posts from around the Web &#187; Coca-Cola “cat’s paw” subordinate bias case dismissed on &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2007/coca-cola-cats-paw-subordinate-bias-case-dismissed-on-settlement-week-before-sup-ct-arguments/#comment-28467</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Posts from around the Web &#187; Coca-Cola “cat’s paw” subordinate bias case dismissed on &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/2007/coca-cola-cats-paw-subordinate-bias-case-dismissed-on-settlement-week-before-sup-ct-arguments/#comment-28467</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by George Lenard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by George Lenard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
