<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADA Amendments — What Difference Will They Make If They Become Law? (Part III)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/ada-amendments-%e2%80%94-what-difference-will-they-make-if-they-become-law-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/ada-amendments-%e2%80%94-what-difference-will-they-make-if-they-become-law-part-iii/</link>
	<description>Workplace News &#38; Views, Edited by St. Louis Labor &#38; Employment Lawyer George Lenard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/ada-amendments-%e2%80%94-what-difference-will-they-make-if-they-become-law-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-41162</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/?p=2235#comment-41162</guid>
		<description>Transitory means it comes and goes (think remission).  The flu runs its course and is gone forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transitory means it comes and goes (think remission).  The flu runs its course and is gone forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cope</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/ada-amendments-%e2%80%94-what-difference-will-they-make-if-they-become-law-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-41079</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/?p=2235#comment-41079</guid>
		<description>It appears that according to the amendments to the ADA, a transitory impairment such as the flu would qualify as a disability under the first prong, since temporary impairments are explicitly excluded from the definition of disability only in the third prong.

Would you consider a future article that addresses this significant expansion of the need for accommodations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that according to the amendments to the ADA, a transitory impairment such as the flu would qualify as a disability under the first prong, since temporary impairments are explicitly excluded from the definition of disability only in the third prong.</p>
<p>Would you consider a future article that addresses this significant expansion of the need for accommodations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
