<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Gives NASA Lesson on Background Checks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/nasa-employment-background-checks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/nasa-employment-background-checks/</link>
	<description>Workplace News &#38; Views, Edited by St. Louis Labor &#38; Employment Lawyer George Lenard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:49:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; The Week In Recruiting (Reading the blogs, so you don't have to...) JimStroud.com: Exploring the wacky world of employment</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/nasa-employment-background-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-39543</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; The Week In Recruiting (Reading the blogs, so you don't have to...) JimStroud.com: Exploring the wacky world of employment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/nasa-employment-background-checks/#comment-39543</guid>
		<description>[...] Hun&#8217;h? I thought it was called Simply Hired. 2. That&#8217;s entertainment 3. Background checks done by Space Cadets 4. Umm&#8230; dude, that&#8217;s a lady 5. How you feelin&#8217;? Hot, hot, hot&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hun&#8217;h? I thought it was called Simply Hired. 2. That&#8217;s entertainment 3. Background checks done by Space Cadets 4. Umm&#8230; dude, that&#8217;s a lady 5. How you feelin&#8217;? Hot, hot, hot&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workplace-law</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/nasa-employment-background-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-39443</link>
		<dc:creator>workplace-law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/nasa-employment-background-checks/#comment-39443</guid>
		<description>Wow. That really does seem highly intrusive. Whilst some background checks are obviously vital for some jobs, it makes you really question the motives of an employer that would delve so deep into an employees life. People need to be aware of their rights to privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That really does seem highly intrusive. Whilst some background checks are obviously vital for some jobs, it makes you really question the motives of an employer that would delve so deep into an employees life. People need to be aware of their rights to privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert edward cenek</title>
		<link>http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/nasa-employment-background-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-39400</link>
		<dc:creator>robert edward cenek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employmentblawg.com/2008/nasa-employment-background-checks/#comment-39400</guid>
		<description>Great post!

Underscores the importance of keeping the selection process job-related.

robert edward cenek
Cenek Report
www.cenekreport.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>Underscores the importance of keeping the selection process job-related.</p>
<p>robert edward cenek<br />
Cenek Report<br />
<a href="http://www.cenekreport.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cenekreport.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
